That’s right, a new feminist study has come to the iron-clad conclusion that if you don’t have sex with someone of another ethnicity or race of your own – that makes you a racist. A sexual bigot.
I’m going to refrain from jokes throughout this entire article, because honestly, isn’t it funny enough? I guess if you don’t have sex with your dog, you hate animals – but I said I wasn’t going to make jokes, didn’t I? This is serious! by Rodney Lee Conover
“LIKE” my Facebook Page – no one turned away!
Yes, you heard that right folks, the Politically Correct Gestapo now want to dictates who you should have sex with. In the study entitled “Is Sexual Racism Really Racism,” researchers with the University of New South Wales assert that having racial preferences when it comes to sex is “sexual racism.”
“In fact, men who used online dating services more frequently were generally more likely to register as racist…,” feminist Samantha Allen wrote in an article about the study.
“After putting these two data sets together, the trend was clear: ‘Sexual racism… is closely associated with generic racist attitudes, which challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference.’”
In other words, according to this “study,” if you’ve never had sex with someone outside your race, you’re probably racist, even if you’re a devout Christian who’s happily married and never slept around.
I guess only certain groups get to have “preferences?” Apparently not –
The Daily Beast also reports that debates around “sexual racism,” as researchers have labeled it, are particularly heated within the gay community, although it is certainly a source of controversy in heterosexual circles as well. It is also an argument that could soon be settled by emerging sociological research.
The new Australian study published in Archives of Sexual Behavior entitled “Is Sexual Racism Really Racism?” suggests that the answer to that question is probably “yes.” Sex researchers Denton Callander, Christy Newman, and Martin Holt asked over 2,000 gay and bisexual Australian men how they felt about race and dating through an online survey.
Even before the researchers compared the men’s attitudes on race and online dating to their QDI scores, they unearthed some telling data points.
Sixty-four percent of the men said it is acceptable to state a racial preference on an online dating profile and 46 percent said these preferences do not bother them. Men who had experienced racial exclusion in the past were, predictably, more likely to report being bothered by it than men who hadn’t but, still, a staggering 70 percent disagreed with the argument that sexual racism is “a form of racism.” A majority of them perceived racial exclusion as “a problem” but were reluctant to attribute it to racism.
So you know where this is heading, right?
The inevitable destination of extreme SJW victimization is the morphing of everything into prejudice. Don’t like Asian food? That’s racist because you’re not spending your dollars to support Asian restaurants. Don’t like rap music? That’s racist because you’re not helping Tyrone rise out of poverty.
In other words: personal preference is criminalized into a hate crime. But of course, the true purpose of all this bleeding-heart liberalism is to guilt one race (whites) into crippling their potential for other races. It has nothing to do with fairness.