A 12-year-old girl is a child. When a child is raped and the scumbag caught, most everyone is thinking of the appropriate punishment: It has to do with him first losing the weapons of his crime in a crude way, then it gets more and more painful from there, until he joins the other scumbags in the Satanic Hilton.
What difference does it make? Ha ha ha! Cackle!
Hillary Rodham made a different choice in 1975, as a 27-year-old defense attorney when she voluntarily took on the case of one Thomas Alfred Taylor who attacked and brutally raped a 12-year-old virgin.
Exploiting a mistake by the prosecution and painting the 12-year-old as a psychotic nympho, seeking older men for sex – Hillary got the rapist off with time-served on a lesser charge. Which is what a good defense lawyer is supposed to do, by the way – I’m not faulting the victory. I’ve never criticized Hillary Clinton’s immense success.
Some years later, however, the rape victim has come forward to tell her side of the story and say how Ms. Rodham, now of course, Hillary Clinton – lied and misrepresented the facts in the case in order to get the rapist off. Lawyers will tell you that everyone deserves a vigorous defense or the legal system will fall apart and that’s true – but how far should a lawyer go to that end?
The victim was in a coma for five days and spent months recovering with doctors saying she’d probably never have children. Undoubtedly she’s been suffering horribly ever since as any child first brutalized first by an attacker, then the system. But did Hillary ever have second thoughts?
Apparently not..
Because roughly ten years later, Hillary was interviewed on audio tape and very casually chats about knowing her client was guilty and even laughing several times about getting him off.
Listen for yourself – Hatip Washington Free Beacon
In addition, Hillary Clinton – the great defender of women – viciously attacked the child-rape victim as the little slut who had it coming, wanted it and was responsible for the crime – all of which the victim claims are outright lies.
In a July 28, 1975, court affidavit, Clinton wrote that she had been informed the young girl was “emotionally unstable” and had a “tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.”
“I have also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior,” Clinton said.
Clinton said the child had “in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body” and that the girl “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
Perhaps this was just practice for what was to come with Bubba and the “Bimbo Eruptions”?
The issue here is not should Hillary Rodham as a young lawyer try her best to win a case – that’s her job. The issue here is: Will Hillary lie to get ahead? Will she step over the raped or dead bodies of people to pursue her career?
It’s clear to any objective person witnessing her body of behavior over the years that she’s only an advocate for women if they don’t get in her way. If they do, she can just as easily destroy them…
… and laugh it off.
-30-
email Rodney Lee Conover: kowenhoven@gmail.com
Sugar? No thanks, I’m sweet enough..
follow Rodney Lee on Twitter @RCCA08
Friend him on Facebook – no one refused
